“Gay Pride” Flag Flagpole Flap
So the Cleveland suburb of Lakewood (map), has recently become the center of controversy here in Ohio. Earlier, it was over the cities attempts at an “eminent domain land grab” (long story–another can ‘o worms).
Here’s the original article from the paper: Lakewood veterans and gays poles apart on flag compromise
So Lakewood’s latest controversy is over the city’s decision to fly the “gay pride” flag at City Hall. To paraphrase the articles, the original idea was to hang the flag on the main pole below the US Flag, POW-MIA Flag and State of OH flag.. Then that idea was put on the backburner as a debate ensued as to whether the rainbow flag should be allowed to fly. Ultimately, the city decided to splurge and erected a seperate pole on which they decided to fly the flag. They’ve also said that other groups will also be able to fly their flags on said pole.
The “question of the day” today in the paper was about people’s responses to the decision.
Then Dick Feagler, a (long time) local columnist, who is usually cynical of…well, just about everything, wrote a great opinion piece today entitled: “Flagpole proliferation won’t create unity “, and to summarize his point–the American flag is the one which covers us all, and as such it should be the only flag flying.
I’m inclined to agree with Feagler (for a change), however, I’m not in total agreement. I respect the right of cities to fly the POW/MIA flag as a reminder/memorial to those members of the armed forces who are/were POWs/MIA–the public should be aware of such things. As for the state flag, eh, I”m not so big on it, but since this is a gov’t, we should fly the flag as a sign of respect. But I do believe that the US flag should fly taller than all the other flags.
As for Lakewood’s decision to erect another pole–I disagree with it. No, I’m not a bigot or a homophobe, as I actually have friends who are members of the GBLTQIA (is that the current term?) population. I don’ t care about people’s sexual orientation, as long as it doesn’t involve me, I just consider it to be none of my buisness. With that aside, I don’t see why a city should be flying such a flag. I agree with Feagler. Furthermore, I agree with the argument that’s been put forth, that this establishes a bad precident. Now anyone can argue to have their flag flown in Lakewood–from the Nazis (curse them), the UN, the hippies, “Black Power” people, anti-abortion groups, Christian groups, heck, there could even be an Islamofacist flag hanging (okay, perhaps that’s excessive, but do you get the point?).
I believe that a US gov’t agency shouldn’t be hanging flags for different interest groups–other than official national flags. By official I mean the US flag, state/city flags, or any of the Armed forces flags. I thnk that by flying one “special interest” flags, you’ve opened the door to any and all flags, and if you attempt to censor a few, a battle with emerge over First Ammendment/free speech stuff. Also, things like this divide communities, and that’s undesireable from the perspective of a civic office.
There’s another issue to adress and that is the complaint from the “gay rights” community (Anyone know the current acronym) saying that by erecting a seperate pole, they’re only showing “half support”. I disagree with that. First off, I should say that I know the activist who the Plain Dealer quoted (family friend) and let me reiterate, that my disagreement with her opinion does not mean that she’s an evil or bad person–she’s actually a very nice individual. With that aside, I think that the activists should be content with just having their flag up. Had I been in charge, I would have respectfully declined the request and explained why, while other Lakewood residents appear to harbor much more angry/passionate feelings. So they should be happy with what they have.
This’ll be interesting to watch as the whole flag controversy continues to play out in the future.