I’m starting to think that the NY Times is just trying to egg on blogs, in order to build them up and then slam them as a way to get revenge for everything the blogs have (rightfully) done against the NYT.
With that in mind, comes this Opinion piece from the times, which all but feeds the moonbats conspiracy theories: The New York Times > Opinion > Making Votes Count: About Those Election Results
And a comment on one point the NYT makes:
The wild rumors about Cuyahoga County, Ohio, where the official results appeared to include an extra 90,000 votes, were a result of its bizarrely complicated method of posting election results, which is different in even- and odd-numbered years
It’s ashame that the bid to reform the county gov’t was shot down this past year….that would’ve been the first step in cleaning up the many messes.
and another thing for the times:
Besides election equipment that is easy to check for error, the strongest defense against conspiracy theorists is election officials who act with openness and integrity. Here, too, the current system is at fault. Ohio and Florida, two of the key states in the election, have highly partisan secretaries of state who favored the Republicans all year in their rulings.
Um, and that’s why Sec. of State Blackwell (R-OH), kept Nader off the Ballot and has also been publically butting heads with the state’s repoublican governor (and some in the state GOP)? Better check your sources….